Archives

2021年 November9日 Tuesday

National Land Bank of Berkeley v. Warner, 292 U.S. 53 (1934). National Land Bank of Berkeley v. Warner

National Land Bank of Berkeley v. Warner, 292 U.S. 53 (1934). National Land Bank of Berkeley v. Warner

U.S. Great Judge

1. a stipulation in a grazing financing financial that, in case there is accommodate to foreclose, the mortgagor shall shell out an acceptable attorney’s fee are fixed by the trial, are good in Federal grazing mortgage work if legitimate in the state guiidelines. P. 292 U. S. 54 .

2. the intention of the Farm finance Act would be to make it possible for producers, by mortgaging the company’s lands, to find financial products at low cost, and also this intent might be noticed in deciding what exactly is an affordable attorney’s fee in a foreclosure taking the next step. P. 292 U. S. 57 .

Certiorari, 290 U.S. 620, to check out the affirmance of a decree foreclosing a ranch finance home loan in which the trial courtroom received refused to cause an agreement for a legal professional’s costs.

U.S. Great Trial

Government Land-bank of Berkeley v. Warner

CERTIORARI TOWARD THE GREAT TRIAL OF ARIZONA

1. a stipulation in a grazing debt home loan that, just in case of match to seize, the mortgagor shall pay an inexpensive lawyer’s costs staying remedied because courtroom, happens to be good underneath the government ranch Loan Act if valid beneath state law. →続きを読む